The pack leader and I headed up to the Farmington (Connecticut) antiques show today, as we do most years at about this time. There were lots of people there with their dogs (including a seriously handsome and well-behaved pair of schnauzers and an adorable boxer puppy), and we briefly felt guilty about not bringing Dinah or Crispin, but it was hot hot hot humid humid humid and about the time we broke down and bought overpriced (but medically necessary) Italian ices, we decided they were probably happier at home after all.
Besides the living and breathing dogs, we saw lots of dog collectibles, like these:




and

Clearly I have a weakness for terriers in general and airedales in particular. I get airdales. And who wouldn’t love an airedale on wheels? Actually, it’s probably a good thing they don’t have wheels. I can only imagine the roller derby hell speeding through my kitchen and living room if Dinah and Crispin were that mobile! And of course they’d have to have scary roller derby names, perhaps Dina-Myte and The Crispinator. And we’d have to have our identities changed and go into hiding.
Here’s the thing I don’t get, though. Collectibles. Collecting things. Ask the pack leader, who has filled much of the house with antique fly fishing rods. They’re lovely. They’re (sort of) useful. But would one or two, even 5 or 6, not be enough? Instead of, oh, 4 or 5 hundred? I guess I just don’t have the gene (though I fully appreciate that in lean years–and there have been a number of those), the fly rod trade has served us well.
I know there are people who collect dog stuff, either in general or specific to a breed to which they are partial. I have a pin of an airedale. And I once gave the pack leader an Airedale Pale Ale tee shirt he wears at the gym. But that’s as far as I can take it. Two airedales are in and of themselves a complete collection for me.
What about you–do you collect stuff related to dogs? What do you have, and what are you still looking for?


4 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 16, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Roxanne
I do not collect things either. To me collections = clutter. That darling boy I’m married to has different ideas though, so the collections in our house are all his. Thankfully, we’re talking about relatively small collections (20 or so items in each). Most are in beautifully lit cases.
That dog on wheels was neat, though.
June 16, 2008 at 4:47 pm
floatingink
Oh, we have plenty of clutter–I’d just rather have 100 DIFFERENT pieces of clutter in a room than 100 pieces mostly the same! My rule is more the “useful and beautiful” one–something has to be either or both of those to earn house room.
Hey! I guess the dogs can stay!
June 18, 2008 at 5:10 pm
sandi
I, happily, read something a long time ago–when I was in my formative years, collection-wise, that said that collections were mainly for attracting dust. And since I HATE dusting (and won’t really do it) I decided then and there that I was more a thrower-outer than a collector. However, my dear mother-in-law went through a phase where she decided to send me ceramic sentimental “moms” which I take out of hiding and dust off when she is going to arrive. I do love those dogs on wheels, and share with you the gratitude prayer that our dogs have not evolved to have wheels (not yet, at least.) Love the idea of Dinah-mite and the Crispinator. (Don’t let them hear you use those names; those are the kinds of names they might try to live up to!)
July 4, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Debo
I’m a confirmed (some would say neurotic) clutter-cleaner and don’t collect anything. But boy would I love to have that Airedale on wheels!!!